TestComplete

I use TestComplete on a daily basis. For the last 3 year I have been dogged by compatibility issues, TC browser extensions issues, slowness, freezing. The product can't properly perform object recognition (if button exits then click it, if button does not exist then try.. ) Support and Account managers take a long time to respond to tickets and often the issues are blockers for me. Some of their support engineers are amazing but just take ages to get your issue to them, the phones are hardly ever answered and when they do the person can't address your issue. I find tests have to be run over 100 times to verify the results and work out any bugs to get anything stable enough to run (anything large than unit tests). I frequently get an error and the product stops error says "there has been an error" and gives not details, multiple supports ticket have been raised about this issue and they just say "it works for us" All other feature such as mobile testing (Bitbar) are additional costs - a small free amount would be nice considering the price AM just send out blanket emails to subscribers and any other emails about new products/services without any consideration to if you have the product, have already updated or are listed as the licensing contact - all other users in my licensing group regularly receive and send me the product email they get I am currently investigating alternatives as this products will if not reliable to test my WEB systems

We attempted to use test complete to perform functional and UI tests on our windows native as well as our swift and kotlin apps. In my experience, test complete failed miserably on functional tests incorporating the mobile apps cameras. On the native windows app written in c# test complete has been nothing short of a nightmare. We find ourselves troubleshooting it more than we do our app. You can run the same test twice in a row on a dedicated vm and get the test to pass one time and fail the other with no changes made to the app your testing.

We use TestComplete to automate testing of Microsoft Office AddIns that are based on .NET and WPF. We use a mix of keyword tests and scripting to create testing suites that can run autonomously and report through various checkpoints (region checkpoints for visuals, OCR checkpoints for text recognition, property checkpoints to verify the expected status of UI elements). The interfacing of scripts and keyword tests can be a hassle, but is still very doable and allows for different levels of expertise to work together. Objects can be found, identified (by their properties), and saved in the name mapping that also allows to then address them under an alias for improved usability. Finding objects is possible both by locating them on-screen or if they are in a lower hierarchy (or you'd like to add mappings for non-visual objects) the object browser is a powerful tool to analyze the whole structure of an application. This provides us with key functionality for our test automation.

We use TestComplete as the test automation tool for our suite Windows Forms applications and modules - over 100 different modules in total. It allows users without an existing test automation background to develop automated test suites and execute those on demand. This leads to increased accuracy and repeatability of our tests while reducing the time it takes to run our regression suites.

TestComplete has been chosen in our Organization to automate the Business Flows performed in IFS (Industrial and Financial Systems) ERP Applications. It will run all the test cases (scenarios) for different modules (Order to Cash, Procurement to Pay, Finance, HR, and many more) in the application and will generate a detailed test report. Manual Intervention is not needed. This has benefited us in terms of Regression and Non-Regression Testing.

UI Testing of MS Office Plugins, which we provide to about 2 Mio Users worldwide. Used in Powerpoint, Excel, Word, and Outlook. Testing covers using Microsoft Office Features as well as windows and functionality of our add-ins. We use picture comparison and value comparison to verify our results. Especially our add-in for Powerpoint charts uses highly customized windows and menus in overlays over the actual Powerpoint charts.

We are migrating Manual TestCases to an Automated framework using TestComplete. I am responsible for creating this framework integrating TestComplete with Jenkins and the qTest management tool. Our software is responsible for simulation and is based on C++ with MFC library and for testing. Our main problem with automation is correct create locators and mapping for all of our cases in-app which contains a lot of old code and new approach and [integrating] it with one testing framework

We use TestComplete on our product known as Omni Accounts. TestComplete helps us in automating the testing process with the mundane repetitive tasks that are required with each release. To manually do these tests, will take a lot of time, and as we know time is money. With TestComplete, this process is automated and it does not take as much effort and time as a manual process. It is a brilliant product and even someone without coding knowledge will be able to create test cases. The test recorder does most of the work for you.

Used for UI testing of our desktop application. Really helpful to check for regression in the hundreds of small features it has, especially when a Unit Test isn't possible, because a lot of GUI logic is needed before launching the business logic. It is also great to know that each window, tab, and popup was checked before release, especially when the test users mainly focus on the new feature of the software.

Used for web app test automation, data validation, and [creating] data to facilitate testing.

TestComplete is being used in our organization by our QA team to support our custom in-house applications as well as our externally facing web site applications. TestComplete has allowed us to push more reliable code out more quickly giving us the confidence that the development team hasn't broken other areas of our applications. We previously were pushing out changes without knowing that other areas broke since we didn't have the time to manually test everything.

TestComplete can be used fully to automate all desktop, web, and mobile apps across different teams or organizations. Most of the ROI reduces a lot of scripting and time, in order to solve errors and warnings since TestComplete supports AI driven self-healing mechanisms. It also integrates with all the CI/CD tools/bug tracking tools easily.
It has increased speed by delivery (record/playback, reusability of scripts), automation made simpler(manual testers/anybody can use it with no skillset), and delivery of the quality customers want (AI features helps you correct and detect potential issues).

We have 150 different applications that we test using different tools. TestComplete is one of the tools that we are using prominently to test our many applications.

TestComplete is mainly used across our all departments and I would say people are widely using that.

It removes the complexity of using difficult tools like Selenium and no prior programming language knowledge is needed to create or run these tests. We are automating our sanity and regression test suites using Test Complete.

TestComplete is used within my company in special projects. We use it to automate the regression tests for a product we develop for our customers.

We used TestComplete for automation testing on our web application regression testing daily. We use it for our department application. Mostly we use it as a daily regression test to test each main function of the application [for] most UI functions.

I started using TestComplete about 7 years ago when I was brought into the company to set up a formal software QA process. I had used a few other automation tools in the past but wanted to try a bunch out on the new software. I ended up going with SmartBear as it worked well with the software I was going to test. With TestComplete's modules, I was able to use web and mobile scripts easily. Our sales tools have complex formulas to get pricing, so TestComplete made it easy to do. I pull rates from the DB, use an Excel spreadsheet to store options/data for each scenario to run, calculate the values, then easily compare to what is shown on the screen to verify. Android app was just as easy to use.

For the second set of automation, I created data entry scripts that allow TestComplete to enter business data into our main system 24/7 with the desktop module. This ensures that there's no human error entering and it saves from having a team input data for days on end. Adding TestExecute to a virtual machine means that I can push my TC code there and have any number of users run the data entry scripts at anytime. By adding code to allow the user to pick their Excel sheet of data and which line to start on, I don't ever need to babysit the execution of the automation or make changes to the code on the fly.

This is saving the company time and money that can be invested back into the departments for other things. I have a single development TestComplete license for myself and have numerous TestExecute licenses for anyone to use. The license manager sits on a physical machine that they have access to pull from.

We use it as a test automation tool for UI regression testing. It provides good test coverage and provides unique solutions to most of our automation challenges (e.g. comparison of images).

My organization uses TestComplete to automate testing of our custom software. The software is a windows application, used with a medical device that we are designing. The software and test engineers use this program at my organization. TestComplete automates testing which allows for quicker and more thorough software validation. This helps us to iterate quicker on software releases.

TestComplete is used by several teams in my organization but not all. It is typically used for test automation and mainly for functional and regression testing.

I am a lead on the Automation Team. TestComplete is used among my organization for various products. We build upon what TestComplete offers us as our core with our code application-specific frameworks and scripts for sanity, smoke, and regression testing. QA are trained against the TestComplete tool, the FWK and coding to learn how to script, execute, debug, and analyze the results. TestComplete helps greatly to catch defects, DEV changes, design flaws, and performance before releasing to our clients. These issues can only be caught if the scripts are coded in a smart fashion and TestComplete helps with the functionality it provides.

By being able to use data-driven testing some quite boring and tedious Tests with 1000 testcases can be nicely run automated to ensure we didn't break anything. One nice Addition to this fine Software (which would make it PERFECT) would be, if it supported testing Delphi Firemonkey applications at least on Android, starting to actually work on this (they've already been told in the past that this is a shortcomming of their product), instead of asking the user whether everything is fine, would be even more helpful!

The main usage of the tool is automation of our regression testing. However often we use it to quickly solve some tasks where user actions required to be automated. Despite the fact that we are the bank, we develop a number of own applications like Internet-bank for web and mobile platforms, custom modules for our CRM system etc. TestComplete is used only by our QA department.

TestComplete is being used mainly by the QA Department to run automation regression tests for older features to make sure nothing is broken when new features are released. This saves us time to allow us to focus on new features while still covering the old features and allows us to catch bugs that would normally be left out because there wasn't enough coverage.

TestComplete is used across our department. It is primarily used to automate GUI interfaces to our application product suite.

[It's] Used by QA to write and run automated scripts to test several desktop applications which are coded in Delphi.